- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 10:39:57 -0400
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml- > processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Sunday, 2011 May 01 14:15 > To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > Subject: XProc Minutes 21 April 2011 > Paul wonders if we could do better about attributes named "xml:id" > and "id" I looked into this, and xml:id really doesn't help us. In fact, section 8 Extensibility says: This specification is not extensible. There are no provisions for application designers to alter the name of the xml:id attribute, the set of attribute values that are considered IDs, the location(s) where they can occur, or make any other extensions. So the xml:id spec is really about xml:id only. What it says about xml:id attributes would be nice to be able to say about attributes named id, but as it stands, the xml:id spec doesn't give us that leeway. paul
Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 14:41:19 UTC