- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:07:11 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Further to discussion last month, I've looked at this, and I think in fact the right thing to say is, it's orthogonal. That is, insofar as this spec. is focussed on the _information content_ of the data model constructed per the various profiles, we already cover the _impact_ of validation (it only affects the [element content whitespace] property of CIIs) at that level. On the other hand, I think it would be entirely reasonable to add a Note to section 6, Conformance, along these lines Note: Validation against a DTD or other schema is almost entirely orthogonal to the data model concerns this specification addresses. It is open to any specification which references this one in a conformance statement to include wording requiring (or indeed forbidding) validation of one or more varieties. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFOAxBPkjnJixAXWBoRAm5yAJ9eJj3vRanKg3Vnl4EL+DoXO8l57ACeNc/I KQUzBazLraxsrD7fsjSrJMA= =Dylh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 10:07:46 UTC