- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:49:55 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 13:50:24 UTC
James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes: > p:data is a lot more sophisticated in terms of handling non xml data > and I was wondering if it would be worth harmonising p:load > which could result in us adopting p:data attributes as p:option (and > implicit wrapping behavior) or redefining the step with a non primary > input port > which uses p:data ? Yes. We added p:data late in the process. I think we should consider some sort of harmonization in V.next. We should at least follow the model of XSLT 3.0 and attempt to make JSON support first-class, even if we don't go "all the way" to make arbitrary data first-class. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 413 624 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 13:50:24 UTC