- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:06:11 +0000
- To: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
I'm not happy with this change at the beginning of the Conformance section:
<phrase diff="add">feature sets provided, supported specifications and
faithful description of how the processor is configured</phrase>
> <phrase diff="del">depending on its configuration</phrase>.
An XML processor may conform to one or more of the profiles defined
in this specification, depending on its configuration.
-->
An XML processor may conform to one or more of the profiles defined
in this specification, depending on feature sets provided, supported
specifications and faithful description of how the processor is
configured
The point this para. was intended to convey was _just_ that one
processor might conform to more than one profile, depending on
configuration. The proposed additional material just confuses things,
in my opinion.
I also find the new next paragraph confusing. Could we have instead
simply
Conformance conditions for each profile are specified in the
corresponding sub-section of [ref. Section 2].
?
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 12:09:05 UTC