Re: New editor's draft of XML Processor Profiles

It seems in the draft supposed to be published on 21
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xml-proc-profiles-20101021/

That neither the problem of XML:id and the profilesa typo has been fixed
*" Data model invariants within profilesa given
profile<http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html#within_profile_invariants>
"
* Mohamed had said:

 Probably I missed something but the XProc 1.0 spec says
 that Load "It may perform xml:id processing". So I cannot
 understand why the following pipeline:
  <p:pipeline xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc">
    <p:xinclude fixup-xml-base="true" fixup-xml-lang="true"/>
  </p:pipeline>
 is able to do "3. Identification of all xml:id attributes as
 IDs as required by [xml:id Version 1.0]"

I'm not positive I understand his point, but I think he
is saying that XProc doesn't require xml:id processing,
so the sample pipeline may not identify all xml:id
attributes, in which case it would not implement the
recommended profile as stated.

I didn't see any changes in this area, so I wondered
if this comment has been addressed.

Regards,

Mohamed

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Innovimax W3C
<innovimax+w3c@gmail.com<innovimax%2Bw3c@gmail.com>
> wrote:

> Thanks Paul
>
> Indeed I don't see any answer about this point
>
> Let me add two small typos
>
> "in that the mappingXML processors"
> " Data model invariants within profilesa given profile<http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html#within_profile_invariants>
> "
>
> Regards,
>
> Mohamed
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org
>> [mailto:public-xml-
>> > processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry S. Thompson
>> > Sent: Wednesday, 2010 September 22 13:01
>> > To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
>> > Subject: New editor's draft of XML Processor Profiles
>> >
>> > available for review.  Mostly editorial changes.  Only changes since
>> > previous draft have been highlighted in the diff version.
>> >
>> >   http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html
>> >   http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/diff.html
>>
>> Looks good to me with one question.
>>
>> Mohamed had said:
>>
>>  Probably I missed something but the XProc 1.0 spec says
>>  that Load "It may perform xml:id processing". So I cannot
>>  understand why the following pipeline:
>>   <p:pipeline xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc">
>>     <p:xinclude fixup-xml-base="true" fixup-xml-lang="true"/>
>>   </p:pipeline>
>>  is able to do "3. Identification of all xml:id attributes as
>>  IDs as required by [xml:id Version 1.0]"
>>
>> I'm not positive I understand his point, but I think he
>> is saying that XProc doesn't require xml:id processing,
>> so the sample pipeline may not identify all xml:id
>> attributes, in which case it would not implement the
>> recommended profile as stated.
>>
>> I didn't see any changes in this area, so I wondered
>> if this comment has been addressed.
>>
>> paul
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Innovimax SARL
> Consulting, Training & XML Development
> 9, impasse des Orteaux
> 75020 Paris
> Tel : +33 9 52 475787
> Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
> http://www.innovimax.fr
> RCS Paris 488.018.631
> SARL au capital de 10.000 €
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €