- From: murray <murray@muzmo.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 09:58:04 -0800
- To: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson),public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
I saw this very same article, with correct attributions, elsewhere recently. I am sorry that they got your name wrong, Henry. I presume that you know that Henry Thomas was E.T. in the Spielberg film. I was amused that an editor would let 'Mark Logic' get by without a fact-check. How on earth did they make so few errors, yet make manage to make those? I think that this has to be a prank. Murray ----- Original Message Follows ----- From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org Subject: I can't begin to imagine how they managed this. . . Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 22:28:31 +0100 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Check out the quote attributions: > > http://technews.acm.org/#463552 > > ht > - -- > Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, > University of Edinburgh > 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- > (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: > ht@inf.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail > without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFL7cB/kjnJixAXWBoRAmBOAJ4706a0XQv1EV9UAVxwQWBCG5937g > Cgggbt fBX3gZJ9b7zLiKTmHebqD+A=57bB > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
Received on Saturday, 15 May 2010 17:49:43 UTC