- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:52:12 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m24og9g8tv.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-minutes
[1]W3C
- DRAFT -
XML Processing Model WG
Meeting 177, 08 Jul 2010
[2]Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
Attendees
Present
Henry, Alex, Carine, Norm
Regrets
Paul, Mohamed
Chair
Norm
Scribe
Norm
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Accept this agenda?
2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
3. [7]Next meeting: telcon, 15 July 2010?
4. [8]Comments on WD
5. [9]Review latest editor's draft
6. [10]Possible XProc 1.1 feature
7. [11]Any other business?
* [12]Summary of Action Items
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept this agenda?
-> [13]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-agenda
Henry: I'd like to talk about an addition to XProc for 1.1.
Norm: Ok.
Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
-> [14]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/01-minutes
Accepted.
Next meeting: telcon, 15 July 2010?
Henry gives regrets for 15 July through 5 August.
Comments on WD
Norm: I don't think there have been any new comments and I failed to
follow up with Bjoern, so I don't think there's anything here this week.
... Henry, how goes the draft wrt the whitespace issue (invariants)
Henry: No progress so far.
Review latest editor's draft
Carine: I'm not comfortable with four profiles. There seems to be little
justification for that level of granularity.
... It ends up being a do-it-yourself profile with whatever bits you want.
I understand that some of the concern came from the browsers not doing
much.
... It's probably ok to have a very small browser profile, do we need
three more?
... It seems a bit useless to have that many.
Henry: I think that's a good point. I guess I remain moderately hopeful
that looking at the different invariants will give us a reason for making
these distinctions.
Norm: I guess we need three and if we have only three then there will be
one obviously missing.
Henry: We went ahead and added them when people suggested them and before
we publish, or in the next draft, we might call out explicitly the
question of whether we need them all and see what people say.
Norm: Sounds good to me.
... But I'm waffling about it.
<scribe> ACTION: Henry to add a note to the draft raising the question of
whether we really need *four* profiles. [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2010/07/08-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
Carine: That's fine by me. It just looks like the 'pizza menu problem' in
the US. There are all those names.
... I think some note that suggested how each profile might be used would
be helpful.
Norm: That sounds like a good idea to me, we should have suggested uses
for the profiles before we're done.
Possible XProc 1.1 feature
Henry: I keep ending up writing vastly more structure than I need to in
order to build a fragment with a bit of content from the context.
... It would be useful to have a single template rule.
... Maybe it would be sufficient in XProc to allow a version of inline in
which XSLT curly brace rules apply. Or more likely XQuery curly brace
rules apply.
Norm: Yes, I've been there. Figuring out how to get that into XProc is
what's been a stumbling block for me.
Any other business?
None heard.
Adjourned.
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Henry to add a note to the draft raising the question of
whether we really need *four* profiles. [recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2010/07/08-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([18]CVS
log)
$Date: 2010/07/08 17:51:19 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-agenda
3. http://www.w3.org/2010/07/08-xproc-irc
4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-minutes#agenda
5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-minutes#item01
6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-minutes#item02
7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-minutes#item03
8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-minutes#item04
9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-minutes#item05
10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-minutes#item06
11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-minutes#item07
12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-minutes#ActionSummary
13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/08-agenda
14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/01-minutes
15. http://www.w3.org/2010/07/08-xproc-minutes.html#action01
16. http://www.w3.org/2010/07/08-xproc-minutes.html#action01
17. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
18. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 17:52:51 UTC