Re: Connecting output ports of compound steps - inconsistency in the spec? from Henry S. Thompson on 2010-12-03 (public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org from December 2010)

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:57:47 +0000
To: <vojtech.toman@emc.com>
Cc: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bsjyehpjo.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ah, I see, I misread 5.11.

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFM+QVrkjnJixAXWBoRArG7AJ9AwIlyE6MR5dXlE2MbFk3uiUAK3QCfXrcD
5JHhJmxWdb7MB/6L+wJuAKA=
=lGqT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 3 December 2010 14:58:18 UTC