- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:50:37 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2010 14:51:12 UTC
"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> writes:
> Grosso, Paul writes:
>
>> I don't think it matters from where the comment comes.
>>
>> The PR review ends this Thursday. If someone (even on
>> the WG) comments that they support the PR only if we
>> add the missing attribute that we had already decided
>> to add, I would think there should be no problem adding
>> that between PR and Rec, especially if there were a test
>> case with this attribute that 2 implementations passed.
I've implemented it. I think Vojtech has as well. I'll see if I can
construct a test tonight.
> Agreed. Who will bell the cat? (One of us can do it, you can revise a
> response already submitted).
Anyone but me. :-)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | You look wise. Pray correct that
http://nwalsh.com/ | error.--Charles Lamb
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2010 14:51:12 UTC