- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:50:37 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2010 14:51:12 UTC
"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> writes: > Grosso, Paul writes: > >> I don't think it matters from where the comment comes. >> >> The PR review ends this Thursday. If someone (even on >> the WG) comments that they support the PR only if we >> add the missing attribute that we had already decided >> to add, I would think there should be no problem adding >> that between PR and Rec, especially if there were a test >> case with this attribute that 2 implementations passed. I've implemented it. I think Vojtech has as well. I'll see if I can construct a test tonight. > Agreed. Who will bell the cat? (One of us can do it, you can revise a > response already submitted). Anyone but me. :-) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | You look wise. Pray correct that http://nwalsh.com/ | error.--Charles Lamb
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2010 14:51:12 UTC