Re: Dealing with unbound options

"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes:
> Now, if you look at the meeting minutes from May 28 2009:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2009M
> ay/0021.html)
>
> you will see that we agreed on adding a new XPath extension function to
> test for unbound options. But somehow this decision was never
> incorporated into the draft.

Indeed. I wouldn't trust the editor any farther than I could throw him.

Today's editor's draft includes the p:value-available function as described
in the minutes of 28 May.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We have fewer friends than we imagine,
http://nwalsh.com/            | but more than we know.--Hugo Von
                              | Hofmannsthal