- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:44:48 +0200
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
I think that we discuss that here : http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/05/28-minutes I remember Henry proposing a new function for that (to test binding)... My two cents Mohamed On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Someone please tell me I'm having a brain cramp. I want to write a > recursive-directory-list step. It starts out like this: > > <p:declare-step type="cx:recursive-directory-list"> > <p:output port="result"/> > <p:option name="path" required="true"/> > <p:option name="include-filter"/> > <p:option name="exclude-filter"/> > <p:option name="depth" select="-1"/> > > <p:directory-list> > <p:with-option name="path" select="$path"> > <p:empty/> > </p:with-option> > <p:with-option name="include-filter" select="$include-filter"> > <p:empty/> > </p:with-option> > <p:with-option name="exclude-filter" select="$exclude-filter"> > <p:empty/> > </p:with-option> > </p:directory-list> > </p:declare-step> > > Except that the reference to $include-filter is an error if the > include-filter option wasn't specified on the call to > cx:recursive-directory-list. > > I think I remember talking about this. Someone please tell me we > thought of a solution. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | When someone tells you something defies > http://nwalsh.com/ | description, you can be pretty sure > | he's going to have a go at it > | anyway.--Clyde B. Aster > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 07:45:22 UTC