- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 11:48:59 -0500
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: Jean-Guilhem Rouel <jean-gui@w3.org>, webreq@w3.org, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org, Henry Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
On 26 May 2009, at 10:02 AM, Norman Walsh wrote: > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> writes: >>> I think the checker can't find the date because it's in the past. >>> The sentence "Based on known implementations, the Working Group does >>> not plan to request to advance to Proposed Recommendation prior to >>> 01 February 2009." sounds a bit weird. I wonder if it shouldn't be >>> rephrased (but have no strong opinion). CC'ing Ian Jacobs in case he >>> has some input. >> >> Maybe the intention was to say 1 Feb 2010? > > No! No! No! :-) > > We're just publishing a revised draft for the benefit of the public, > we aren't changing anything about the CR. I suppose I could reword > that so that it says something like: > > Based on known implementations, the Working Group does plans to > request to advance to Proposed Recommendation as soon as possible. > An ongoing implementation report will be maintained. > > But I'm not sure that's an improvement. And it doesn't have a date > either. Suggest: Based on known implementations, the Working Group plans to request to advance to Proposed Recommendation as soon as possible after this DD Month 2009 draft. Regarding the implementation report bit...do you have a link? _ Ian > > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Wandering in a vast forest at night, I > http://nwalsh.com/ | have only a faint light to guide me. A > | stranger appears and says to me: "My > | friend, you should blow out your candle > | in order to find your way more > | clearly." This man is a theologian.-- > | Diderot -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 17:00:18 UTC