- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:46:51 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2skb9fszo.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes
[1]W3C
- DRAFT -
XML Processing Model WG
Meeting 162, 17 Dec 2009
[2]Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
Attendees
Present
Norm, Paul, Henry, Mohamed, Vojtech
Regrets
Chair
Norm
Scribe
Norm
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Accept this agenda?
2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
3. [7]Next meeting: telcon, 7 Jan 2010
4. [8]Status of the editor's draft
5. [9]CR issues
6. [10]Version attribute issues
7. [11]193 p:http-request authentication concerns
8. [12]171 Default binding for variable, option, and parameters.
9. [13]187 No media type
10. [14]Options whose names conflict
11. [15]Realistic publication plans
12. [16]Any other business?
* [17]Summary of Action Items
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept this agenda?
-> [18]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-agenda
Accepted.
Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
-> [19]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/03-minutes
Accepted.
Next meeting: telcon, 7 Jan 2010
No regrets heard.
Status of the editor's draft
Norm attempts to summarize.
Norm: I'm afraid we're in a state where we can continue tinkering or do
the last call. I think we should just do the last call.
Henry: Go for it.
CR issues
Let's see if we can close a couple more
Version attribute issues
Norm summarizes.
Norm: For the purpose of determining pipeline version, it only occurs on
p:declare-step, p:pipeline, and p:library.
Vojtech: What if we want to provide more control in V2?
Henry: Why would we do that, and if we did, we'd have to use a different
name. That seems simpler.
Norm: I can live with that.
Proposal: version on p:xslt isn't a conflict because XProc version is only
on the three elements named above.
Accepted.
193 p:http-request authentication concerns
Henry: The world is moving faster than RFC2617 so maybe we want to make
things looser.
Vojtech: I think so too.
... We need to change the text and he'd like to reserve the method
'token'.
Norm: I think it's reasonable to think that's what 'token' will mean, but
we can't standardize that before it's done.
Vojtech: So if someone uses token in the meantime, that's their problem.
Norm: I think so.
Proposal: Make the authentication language looser as suggested.
Accepted.
171 Default binding for variable, option, and parameters.
Norm summarizes.
Accepted.
187 No media type
General agreement that we agreed we *would* do it.
<MoZ> [20]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2007/08/09-minutes
Mohamed: We agreed to do this in August.
Proposal: Define application/xproc+xml
Henry: Yes, and both pipeline and libraries should be served with that
type.
Norm: And we'll say that it has the same fragid syntax as application/xml,
per 3023bis
Accepted.
Options whose names conflict
Norm: In 4.8.1 we say that it isn't an error, you just can't use the
shortcut syntax to specify values for them.
Realistic publication plans
Norm: I'll try to have something by Monday, otherwise definitely by 4
January.
Proposal: The editor is authorized to publish the next editor's draft with
which he is satisfied.
... As a new Last Call WD
Accepted.
Any other business?
Henry: I'm not prepared to lead a discussion now, but the TAG briefly
discussed our default processing model.
<ht> [21]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/12/10-tagmem-minutes.html#item07
Henry: There was one time-sensitive bit of conversation. If you really
think it's *the* one, then it should be referenced from 3023bis.
Norm: Yeah, that doesn't sound unreasonable.
Henry: It would be unreasonable for 3023bis to say that you *should* do
this, but it might want to point helpfully at it.
... We might, for example, want to do that in our description of the
application/xproc+xml media type.
Norm: I don't want to delay Chris, but I suppose if there's time it's
worth doing.
Henry: I think the right thing to do is discuss it explicitly at the 7 Jan
meeting and see if the WG has consensus that we should publish it as a LC
draft.
Norm: Makes sense to me.
Adjourned.
Happy holidays and Happy New Year, everyone!
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [22]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([23]CVS
log)
$Date: 2009/12/17 16:44:39 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-agenda
3. http://www.w3.org/2009/12/17-xproc-irc
4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#agenda
5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item01
6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item02
7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item03
8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item04
9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item05
10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item06
11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item07
12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item08
13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item09
14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item10
15. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item11
16. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#item12
17. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-minutes#ActionSummary
18. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/17-agenda
19. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/12/03-minutes
20. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2007/08/09-minutes
21. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/12/10-tagmem-minutes.html#item07
22. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
23. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:10:52 UTC