- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:37:57 +0000
- To: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[anon] writes:
>> Actually, on closer inspection, I wonder if the intent of
>> 2.13 was to say
>> that XProc version applies to p:pipeline, p:declare-step, or p:library
>> and no where else.
>
> I think that was the intent. In my view, the same XProc version falls in
> the same category as xpath-version and psvi-required. The same
> inheritance rules apply.
+1
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFLHmTFkjnJixAXWBoRAvwnAJ4gv6APyoDe8sLmXxss7KdUwzy30gCcCD1p
C7LlOXXK9pRvd6P0WD2ZX1c=
=8EtC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 14:38:28 UTC