- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:18:54 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 13:19:31 UTC
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > "Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes: >> Good catch. > > Actually, on closer inspection, I wonder if the intent of 2.13 was > to say that XProc version applies to p:pipeline, p:declare-step, or > p:library and no where else. In particular, if we intend for it to apply to any step, then we have to spell it p:version on steps that aren't in the XProc namespace. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The one serious conviction that a man http://nwalsh.com/ | should have is that nothing is to be | taken too seriously.--Nicholas Butler
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 13:19:31 UTC