- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:24:30 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org, ebruchez@orbeon.com, avernet@orbeon.com
- Message-ID: <546c6c1c0809230724w457eb19eq348c769060cee0a7@mail.gmail.com>
If I'm not wrong In http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2007/12/20-minutes the point 86 [[ 86. A really important question Norm: This what extension to use... Henry: Whatever convention we establish, people will follow. ... We ought to give a little thought to the extension ... We could just expose them as .xml ... Since we're toying with a media type, web server administrators will be unhappy if we don't pick a suffix. <ht> allinurl: xpl filetype:xpl Henry: There are about 8000 pages that end in .xpl ... Orbeon uses .xpl Alessandro: works for me! Henry: So is this the way we're going Norm: I'm not really fond of the idea of making a statement directly about it in the spec, but I'm happy to use .xpl in examples and the test suite, etc. Henry: We have an issue about the media type stuff and fragment identifiers. We'll get back to this, indirectly, when we cover that issue. Norm: I'm happy that we have an informal consensus to use .xpl, but I don't feel like we need to add it to the spec just yet. Alessandro: The XSLT spec says that most of the stylesheets use the extension .xsl Norm: Right, in the media type spec, I'm happy to do that too. ]] On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > From private correspondence: > > > I know this is not relevant to [...], but > > the *.xpl extension is used by Orbeon's pipeline definition files yet > > (in a language called XPL.) Maybe it would be worth avoiding > > confusion and don't spread this usage for XProc files? Maybe using > > just *.xp, or using *.xproc would be better? > > Do we want to reconsider .xpl? > > (Erik/Alessandro, were you guys paying attention when we picked .xpl?) > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | More imagination would indeed be a mere > http://nwalsh.com/ | trifling; only no imagination is > | *mere*.--C. S. Peirce > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 14:25:09 UTC