- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:52:19 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 12:53:03 UTC
When we discussed issue 20 at a previous call, I incorrectly asserted that it was a duplicate of issue 15. Issue 15 asks about p:encrypt/p:decrypt steps that perform XML encryption and decryption. Issue 20 asks about p:encrypt/p:decrypt steps that perform *text* encryption, presumably along the lines of GPG. I don't think text encryption is necessary for V1 and propose that we decline to make this change. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Vision is the art of seeing things http://nwalsh.com/ | invisible.-- Swift
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 12:53:03 UTC