- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:52:19 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 12:53:03 UTC
When we discussed issue 20 at a previous call, I incorrectly asserted that
it was a duplicate of issue 15.
Issue 15 asks about p:encrypt/p:decrypt steps that perform XML encryption
and decryption.
Issue 20 asks about p:encrypt/p:decrypt steps that perform *text*
encryption, presumably along the lines of GPG.
I don't think text encryption is necessary for V1 and propose that we
decline to make this change.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Vision is the art of seeing things
http://nwalsh.com/ | invisible.-- Swift
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 12:53:03 UTC