- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 17:43:25 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Yep If c:errorS in the same c:errors are linked to each other because are generated by the same process On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | Can we have best of both world as we already do with c:param : > | > | Letīs say we have a sequence of c:errors > > I suppose we could, but is there any significant benefit in allowing > a sequence of c:errors over just a sequence of c:error? > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A new scientific truth does not triumph > http://nwalsh.com/ | by convincing its opponents and making > | them see the light, but rather because > | its opponents eventually die, and a new > | generation grows up that is familiar > | with it (Planck 1949) > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2008 15:44:02 UTC