- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 15:53:59 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Can we have best of both world as we already do with c:param : Letīs say we have a sequence of c:errors Mohamed On 5/18/08, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > We currently say that the error port of a catch will return a c:errors > document containing one or more c:error elements. I think this is a > mistake. I think we should say simply that a sequence of one or more > c:error documents appears on the error port. > > Given that different steps can generate error messages, it's a real > burden to make sure that they're all wrapped in a single c:errors > element. And the extra work doesn't seem to have any benefits. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We humans are such limited > http://nwalsh.com/ | creatures--how is it that there are so > | few limits when it comes to human > | suffering?--Pierre Marivaux > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000
Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 13:55:43 UTC