- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 09:48:46 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 08:49:36 UTC
Consider this pipeline of sequential steps:
<p:pipeline ...>
<p:warning-a ...>
<p:try>
<p:group>
<p:warning-b ...>
<p:error ...>
</p:group>
<p:catch>
...
</p:catch>
</p:try>
<p:warning-c ...>
</p:pipeline>
Where the "warning" steps write to their error port but don't fail.
The error step writes to its error port and fails.
If I read the errors in the catch, ...
- [May I | Must I | Must I Not] see the warnings generated by warning-a?
- [May I | Must I | Must I Not] see the warnings generated by warning-b?
- [May I | Must I | Must I Not] see the warnings generated by error?
If I read the errors after warning-c, what can I/must I/must I not see?
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A censor is a man who knows more than
http://nwalsh.com/ | he thinks you ought to.--Granville Hacks
Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 08:49:36 UTC