- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 09:48:46 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 08:49:36 UTC
Consider this pipeline of sequential steps: <p:pipeline ...> <p:warning-a ...> <p:try> <p:group> <p:warning-b ...> <p:error ...> </p:group> <p:catch> ... </p:catch> </p:try> <p:warning-c ...> </p:pipeline> Where the "warning" steps write to their error port but don't fail. The error step writes to its error port and fails. If I read the errors in the catch, ... - [May I | Must I | Must I Not] see the warnings generated by warning-a? - [May I | Must I | Must I Not] see the warnings generated by warning-b? - [May I | Must I | Must I Not] see the warnings generated by error? If I read the errors after warning-c, what can I/must I/must I not see? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A censor is a man who knows more than http://nwalsh.com/ | he thinks you ought to.--Granville Hacks
Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 08:49:36 UTC