Re: PSVI property preservation proposal (Pp-cubed :-)

Henry,

I never said *implicit* validation, I was talking about conditional
explicit validation

Mohamed

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>
>  Nothing in my proposal addresses validation by the pipeline engine, as
>  it were.  I don't think we should go there, certainly not in V1.
>
>  ht
>  - --
>
>  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
>                      Half-time member of W3C Team
>     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
>             Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>                    URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>  [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>  Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
>  iD8DBQFIKq80kjnJixAXWBoRAtzlAJ4gqBDmd/39N2qduW0ysH87r4cR9gCfQNS1
>  lxEVybA9EhG2LMSx5YfQ/6s=
>  =rKXZ
>  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €

Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 13:41:08 UTC