- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 08:51:49 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norm, Sorry, I wasn't clear on my goal My goal was to find the hole in the spec where there is room for adding some additionnal feature to steps I was thinking there was a lot, but since all is interdependent at some point, there are few case where it still work Also I wanted to find out which was the error reported to the user if any Mohamed On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > > |> | Does it mean that there is no constraint on parameters or outputs ? > |> > |> You don't get to specify outputs when you call an atomic step, so they > |> aren't really relevant are they? > | > | So it means that if I want to add an alternate output to a step, I can do that > | > | Let's say for example for p:delete, add a "alternate" output for example, > | and then in the following step connect its input to alternate > | > | Where will it fail, if it does ? > > You can't change the declaration for a step in the XProc namespace, so > you can't add another output. Adding another output would change the > inputs and outputs, so you aren't allowed to do that with an extension > attribute. > > > |> There are no constraints on paramters, beyond the fact that you can > |> only specify them on a step that has (at least one) parameter input > |> port. > | > | Well, if I'm correct, it is said in the spec that > | [[ > | It is a static error (err:XS0034) if the specified port is not a > | parameter input port or if no port is specified and the step does not > | have a primary parameter input port. > | ]] > | which means that we can bind a parameter port named "foo" since there > | is no equivalent of the err:XS0012 for input parameters > | [[ > | it is a static error (err:XS0012) if the port given does not match the > | name of an input port specified in the step's declaration. > | ]] > > Sorry, I don't follow. What do you think you can do? > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The most universal quality is > http://nwalsh.com/ | diversity.-- Montaigne > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 06:52:22 UTC