- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 10:20:26 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:21:00 UTC
Henry used p:psvi-available() in his recent example. That got me thinking. We have a mixture of system properties and extension functions and I don't think we've made any sort of consistent choice about which is which. Looking at our list of system properties, I wonder if we should promote p:episode, p:language, p:xpath-version and p:psvi-supported (as well, perhaps, as p:psvi-available) to extension functions. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is not failure of others to http://nwalsh.com/ | appreciate your abilities that should | trouble you, but rather your failure to | appreciate theirs.-- Confucius
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:21:00 UTC