- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 13:58:05 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 11:58:42 UTC
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > I'm ok with the proposed changes. > > / "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | The value of the algorithm option must be a QName. If it does not have a > | prefix, then it must be one of the following values: "crc", "md", "sha", > | "whirlpool" and "ripemd". > > I've never heard of whirlpool. I've heard of ripemd, but have no idea > how to implement it. Are those five exhaustive, or are there other > popular algorithms? Sure there are, but not very frequently used so they can wait for V2 (or propose them during last-call) or use the extension mecanism > > | The value of the version option must be a string. > > You made version required, but I wonder if we should give it an > algorithm-specific default? version=1 if algorithm=sha, 5 if md. That > way, for crc and other algorithms that don't have a version, it won't > be an error to leave it out. Indeed, that could be a way to do that Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 11:58:42 UTC