W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Add p:canonicalize as an optional step or add an option in p:serialize

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 07:57:10 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2bq3qme3t.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| I would go for a p:canonicalize as an optional step

What's it's signature? One input and no outputs, with an href for
where to write the C14N'd octets?

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Klein bottle for rent; enquire within.
http://nwalsh.com/            | 

Received on Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:57:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:41:40 UTC