- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:31:08 +0000
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Norman Walsh writes: > | p:variable*, > | (p:for-each|p:viewport|p:choose|p:group|p:try| > | p:standard-step|pfx:user-pipeline |p:documentation|p:pipeinfo)* > > I don't think that's a necessary restriction. There's no reason why I > shouldn't be able to initialize two or three variables right before > the p:choose that needs them. Hmm. I guess. Given that I think we definitely should _evaluate_ them all at the beginning, I thought it was simpler to _put_ them all at the beginning. . . > | 2) Environment. We need to put bindings back into the environment, see > | 2.5 [2] in the new alternate draft. > > Why no mention of options in 2.5? Because there are no option bindings at the beginning of any containers any more. > In 5.7.1, doesn't > > ...for the enclosing container, with the addition of bindings for all > p:variable elements which precede this p:variable within its surrounding... > > have to read > > ...for the enclosing container, with the addition of bindings for all > p:option and p:variable elements which precede this p:variable within > its surrounding... > > and similarly for p:option? No, because as pointed out above, there _are_ no p:options at the beginning of containers anymore. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH6l4skjnJixAXWBoRAvofAJ9wiwgwJmPh+LkpcL9IoqNq9KcWyQCeKI26 HqwACt+9/rcBqZfBsCERE3Q= =omRz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2008 14:31:42 UTC