- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:16:28 +0200
- To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <546c6c1c0806192316y5600b33dg67827ef61b6ca116@mail.gmail.com>
Dear, [[ 15:15:13 [Norm]Topic: C14N support15:15:19 [Norm]Norm attempt to summarize the minutes15:17:45 [Norm]Norm: For V1.0, let's leave it up to implementors to use an implementation-defined method.15:19:38 [Norm]Alex: But if someone wanted to do it, they'd need to use extension attributes15:19:50 [Norm]Some discussion about whether or not extension attributes are allowed on p:serialization. They are.15:20:07 [Norm]Alex: I'm ok with this story.15:20:17 [Norm]Proposal: Do nothing for this in V1.015:20:39 [Norm]Norm observes that Mohamed isn't here, but hopefull that'll be ok.15:20:46 [Norm]Accepted.]]I'm ok with that as long as there is an exemple in the spec of such extension for C14N ! If I undertstand correctly something like <p:serialization method="myext:c14n" myext:keep-comments="false" xmlns:myext="http://my.company.com/extension" /> Furthermore, I think that in the discussion, Alex mentioned that may be the @method attribute of p:serialization SHOULD be mandatory Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 06:17:08 UTC