RE: Standard error codes - QNames or not?

No, it was about the errors from the xproc-error namespace in general.
 
Vojtech



________________________________

 From: Innovimax SARL [mailto:innovimax@gmail.com] 
 Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:49 PM
 To: Toman, Vojtech
 Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
 Subject: Re: Standard error codes - QNames or not?
 
 
 Vojtech,
 
 err:XD0003 is a *dynamic* error, so it is allowed
 
 I thought you were speaking of *static* error
 
 Mohamed 
  
  
 
 
 On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:02 AM, <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> wrote:
 


  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org
  > [mailto:public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On
  > Behalf Of Norman Walsh
  > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:48 PM
  > To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
  > Subject: Re: Standard error codes - QNames or not?
  >
  >
  > | Related to this, can p:error be used for generating standard XProc
  > | errors (such as err:XS0001)?
  >
  > I'm of two minds. I could see forbidding them on principle, on the
  > other hand, I don't see a lot of danger allowing them.
  >
  
  
  If we allow it, it would make it possible to "rethrow" the standard
  errors in the catch block, for instance, which may be a useful feature:
  
  <p:try>
   <p:group>
     ...
   </p:group>
   <p:catch>
     <p:choose>
       <p:when test="... check for err:XD0003 ...">
         <!-- rethrow err:XD0003 -->
         <p:error code="err:XD0003">
           ...
         </p:error>
       </p:when>
       <p:otherwise>
         <!-- do something else -->
       </p:otherwise>
     </p:choose>
   </p:catch>
  </p:try>
  
  
  Regards
  Vojtech
  
  




 -- 
 Innovimax SARL
 Consulting, Training & XML Development
 9, impasse des Orteaux
 75020 Paris
 Tel : +33 9 52 475787
 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
 http://www.innovimax.fr

 RCS Paris 488.018.631
 SARL au capital de 10.000 €