Re: XProc Minutes 5 June 2008

On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:

> See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/06/05-minutes
>
> W3C[1]
>
>                                   - DRAFT -
>
>                            XML Processing Model WG
>
> 05 Jun 2008
>
>   Agenda[2]
>
>   See also: IRC log[3]
>
> Attendees
>
>   Present
>           Norm, Vojtech, Andrew, Rui, Henry, Richard, Michael[xx:30-]
>
>   Regrets
>           Paul
>
>   Chair
>           Norm
>
>   Scribe
>           Norm
>
> Contents
>
>  pfx:atomic-step
>
>   Vojech: I think it's about the same prefix that we're using for built-in
>   steps and extension steps.
>
>   Norm: Right. I'll fix that.
>
>   <scribe> ACTION: Norm to fix the patterns so that they don't have the
> same
>   prefix in 4.7 and 4.8 [recorded in
>   http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-xproc-minutes.html#action03[9]<http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-xproc-minutes.html#action03%5B9%5D>
> ]
>
>   MoZ, is that what you wanted for the pfx:atomic-step comment?


That's fine for me

Mohamed



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €

Received on Thursday, 5 June 2008 16:10:23 UTC