- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:09:47 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <546c6c1c0806050909k7115fd66u4d9e08f4cc180824@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/06/05-minutes > > W3C[1] > > - DRAFT - > > XML Processing Model WG > > 05 Jun 2008 > > Agenda[2] > > See also: IRC log[3] > > Attendees > > Present > Norm, Vojtech, Andrew, Rui, Henry, Richard, Michael[xx:30-] > > Regrets > Paul > > Chair > Norm > > Scribe > Norm > > Contents > > pfx:atomic-step > > Vojech: I think it's about the same prefix that we're using for built-in > steps and extension steps. > > Norm: Right. I'll fix that. > > <scribe> ACTION: Norm to fix the patterns so that they don't have the > same > prefix in 4.7 and 4.8 [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-xproc-minutes.html#action03[9]<http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-xproc-minutes.html#action03%5B9%5D> > ] > > MoZ, is that what you wanted for the pfx:atomic-step comment? That's fine for me Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2008 16:10:23 UTC