- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:16:20 +0100
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <546c6c1c0802110716w563080f3wa4415ffac2d5a13a@mail.gmail.com>
On Feb 11, 2008 4:01 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > [...] > | But "visible" is still used everywhere without formal definition > > Ok, I attempted to add one at the top of 3.2. > > |> | cannot determine will give the same result in XPath 1.0 that it > would > |> have > |> | given if XPath 2.0 had been used > |> | ]] > |> | is it possible to point to a spec for this sentence ? > |> > |> Do you have a suggestion? > | > | I fear I've none. May be > | http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-backwards-compatibility ? > > I'm not sure that's sufficient, so I'm inclined to leave it to the > discretion > of the implementor. > > |> | This sentence > |> | [[ > |> | All the step types in a pipeline must have unique names: it is a > static > |> | error (err:XS0036) if any step type name is built-in and/or declared > or > |> | defined more than once in the same scope. > |> | ]] > |> | > |> | is a bit troublesome : what is "in the same scope" ? it is clear that > |> there > |> | is a scope for "step names" but not clear for "step types". > |> > |> The beginning of 3.2, "The scope of the names of the step types is..." > |> attempts to explain that. Is it unclear, or do you think it's > incorrect? > | > | No I just think it should be forward referenced here > > But that error is *in* section 3.2. What would you like the reference to > point to? Ok brain cramp again. Sorry for the noise Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 11 February 2008 15:16:40 UTC