- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:48:27 -0500
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
> I've published a new editor's draft containing the > resolutions for issues > 016 and 020, I believe. Great, thanks! Just one thing. Some time ago, there was some discussion about binding/connecting to input ports, and we concluded that "from inside the step", you don't have to connect to its input ports. But section 5.1.2 still contains this text: "If a parameter input port on a p:pipeline is not bound, it is treated as if it was bound to an automatically created p:sink step. In other words, if a p:pipeline does not contain any steps that have parameter input ports, or if those ports are all explicitly bound elsewhere, the parameter input port is ignored. In this one case, it is not an error for an input port to be unbound." Is it still necessary? Regards, Vojtech
Received on Monday, 15 December 2008 07:49:19 UTC