- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:14:43 +0200
- To: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: "public-xml-processing-model-wg WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > Mohamed, > > On 29 Aug 2008, at 22:02, Innovimax SARL wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> So what >>> about: >>> >>> * in the declaration of an atomic step >>> * the required attribute is used to indicate whether the option is >>> required or not >> >> ok >> >>> * the select attribute may be used to declare a default value; if it's >>> not specified the default is implementation-defined >> >> ok >> >>> >>> * in the declaration of a pipeline >>> * if the select attribute is present, it's used as a default value (and >>> required must be 'no') >> >> ok >> >>> * if the select attribute is not present, required must be 'yes', and >>> defaults to that value if it's not specified >> >> shouldn't this one be >> >> * if the select attribute is not present, required must be 'yes', so >> there's no need for defaulting > > > I was meaning that 'required' would default to 'no' (so if select was > present you could specify required="no" and that's OK, or not specify the > required attribute at all, but if you specified required="yes" then you'd > get an error). > Ok you were speaking about the defaulting of the @required ! Sorry for the noise Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Saturday, 30 August 2008 09:15:18 UTC