- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:03:16 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 18:04:38 UTC
"Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes: > There are still all sorts of token and seed and certificates, but > that's what parameters are for > > I think we should not try to be too clever > > If afterwards we see some possible rationnalisation, then we would be > able to add optionals options to the signature in V.next Fair enough, but I'd still be happier if someone could show me what an actual call would look like including all the necessary parameters. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | "I" before "E" except after "C": http://nwalsh.com/ | simple, concise and efficeint.
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 18:04:38 UTC