- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:35:11 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m27ia9tbow.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes: > We could say that we have > > <p:declare-step type="p:encrypt"> > <p:input port="source" primary="true"/> > <p:output port="result"/> > <p:input port="parameters" kind="parameter"/> > <p:option name="match" required="true"/> <!-- XSLTMatchPattern --> > <p:option name="granularity" required="true"/><!-- 'content' or 'element' > --> > </p:declare-step> > > match option would say which elements you want to encrypt and granularity > option would say if you encrypt the matched element or its content Is that all you need to do encryption? Everytime I've tried to understand XMLDSig kits there's been all sorts of stuff about tokens and certificates that I've never been able to get my head around. > <p:declare-step type="p:decrypt"> > <p:input port="source" primary="true"/> > <p:output port="result"/> > <p:input port="parameters" kind="parameter"/> > <p:option name="match" required="true"/> <!-- XSLTMatchPattern --> > </p:declare-step> > > match would match perticular node > {http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#}EncryptedData (if we stick to XML > Encryption spec, but we don't need to) and would decrypt them Again, is there enough information here to do the job? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | First time surrealists are often http://nwalsh.com/ | confused by the similarities between | fish and telephones.
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 13:36:00 UTC