- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:47:31 -0400
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Definitely better ! Works for me On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | [[ > | Note > | > | Since the result of this step is represented by unicode characters in > | the document produced by this step and not as encoded characters > | serialized into a byte stream, the option normalization-form does not > | apply to this step and has been omitted from the standard > | serialization options. > | ]] > | > | Please add that also "byte-order-mark" and "cdata-section-elements" do not apply > | > | And please explain, why "encoding" applies ? > > Better? > > <note> > <para>The result of this step is an XML document that contains the > Unicode characters that are the characters that result from escaping > the input. It is not encoded characters in a serialized octet stream, > therefore, the serialization options related to encoding characters > (<option>byte-order-mark</option>, <option>encoding</option>, and > <option>normalization-form</option>) do not apply. They are omitted > From the standard serialization options on this step.</para> > </note> > > I think cdata-section-elements does apply. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Whoever is abandoned by hope has also > http://nwalsh.com/ | been abandoned by fear; this is the > | meaning of the word "desperate."-- > | Schopenhauer > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2008 12:48:06 UTC