- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:46:04 -0400
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
> Yes. For generating c:param elements, the @name (is an NCName) + > @namespace route is definitely the easiest. (We mandate it in > p:parameters.) > > (I don't think, though maybe I was confused, that there was > ever any motion to remove that option.) No no, I was just asked to come up with a use case where not having @namespace would cause problems. > *All* I was suggesting was that this: > > <c:param-set xmlns:x="http://my/xslt/parameter/namespace"> > <c:param name="x:foo" value="1" > namespace="http:/something/else"/> > </c:param-set> > > should be an error. I agree with this. We can say that it is an error if @namespace is present and it specifies a different namespace. Regards, Vojtech
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 14:48:56 UTC