Saturday, 30 August 2008
Friday, 29 August 2008
- Re: p:option not required without default value
- Re: p:option not required without default value
- Re: p:option not required without default value
- Re: p:option not required without default value
- Re: p:option not required without default value
- Re: p:option not required without default value
- Re: p:option not required without default value
- Re: p:option not required without default value
Thursday, 28 August 2008
- Re: p:option not required without default value
- Re: p:option not required without default value
- p:option not required without default value
- RE: XProc Agenda 28 August 2008
Wednesday, 27 August 2008
Monday, 25 August 2008
Sunday, 24 August 2008
Saturday, 23 August 2008
Friday, 22 August 2008
- Re: Names for p:* steps
- Re: add p:encrypt and p:decrypt optional step
- RE: Names for p:* steps
- Re: Names for p:* steps
- RE: Names for p:* steps
- Re: Names for p:* steps
- Re: UUID : add reference
- Re: Kind of node matched
- Re: add p:encrypt and p:decrypt optional step
- Re: Names for p:* steps
- Re: UUID : add reference
- Re: Kind of node matched
- Re: add p:encrypt and p:decrypt optional step
- Re: Kind of node matched
- RE: Kind of node matched
Thursday, 21 August 2008
- Re: Names for p:* steps
- Names for p:* steps
- Re: UUID : add reference
- Re: Kind of node matched
- Re: add p:encrypt and p:decrypt optional step
- Re: Quirks in code fragment of 5.7.5 Namespaces on variables, options, and parameters
- RE: XProc Agenda 21 Aug 2008
- XProc telcon 21 Aug 2008: CANCELLED
- Re: Spam:*******, XProc Agenda 21 Aug 2008
- RE: Quirks in code fragment of 5.7.5 Namespaces on variables, options, and parameters
- RE: (still few) troubles with p:namespaces
- (still few) troubles with p:namespaces
- RE: p:data and error codes
- New draft and updated last call comments
- Re: p:data and error codes
- [closed] Re: The 'content-type' attribute is not optional on c:data
- [closed] Re: Side question : p:documentation and p:pipeinfo inside c:* elements
- [closed] Re: Correction in relax ng compact model
- Re: Quirks in code fragment of 5.7.5 Namespaces on variables, options, and parameters
- [closed] Re: Quirks in code fragment of 5.7.5 Namespaces on variables, options, and parameters
Wednesday, 20 August 2008
- Side question : p:documentation and p:pipeinfo inside c:* elements
- Correction in relax ng compact model
- Re: Quirks in code fragment of 5.7.5 Namespaces on variables, options, and parameters
- Quirks in code fragment of 5.7.5 Namespaces on variables, options, and parameters
- XProc Agenda 21 Aug 2008
Tuesday, 19 August 2008
- New last call comment tracking
- [closed] Re: Examples for p:data are still using p:file
- Re: Children of p:choose - why are xpath-context and variable ordered?
Monday, 18 August 2008
- Re: XProc Minutes 14 Aug 2008
- examples file.xpl and filebin.xpl
- p:data and error codes
- The 'content-type' attribute is not optional on c:data
- Examples for p:data are still using p:file
Friday, 15 August 2008
- RE: Children of p:choose - why are xpath-context and variable ordered?
- RE: Children of p:choose - why are xpath-context and variable ordered?
- Children of p:choose - why are xpath-context and variable ordered?
Thursday, 14 August 2008
- Call for Exclusions: XProc: An XML Pipeline Language
- XProc Minutes 14 Aug 2008
- Re: 7.1.8 p:escape-markup : Make the note more complete
- Re: 7.1.8 p:escape-markup : Make the note more complete
- XProc Agenda 14 Aug 2008
- RE: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
Wednesday, 13 August 2008
- Re: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
- Re: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
- RE: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
Tuesday, 12 August 2008
- Re: Publication request: XProc on 14 Aug 2008
- Re: Publication request: XProc on 14 Aug 2008
- Re: Publication request: XProc on 14 Aug 2008
Friday, 8 August 2008
Thursday, 7 August 2008
- RE: p:serialization refers to err:XD0020 which does not exist
- Re: p:serialization refers to err:XD0020 which does not exist
- Re: Typo in 7.1.23 (p:split-sequence)
- Re: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
- p:serialization refers to err:XD0020 which does not exist
- Typo in 7.1.23 (p:split-sequence)
- Re: ISO version of Relax NG compact syntax
- Re: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
- Re: ISO version of Relax NG compact syntax
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 (first part)
- Re: ISO version of Relax NG compact syntax
- Re: ISO version of Relax NG compact syntax
- Re: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
- Re: ISO version of Relax NG compact syntax
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 (first part)
- Re: ISO version of Relax NG compact syntax
- Re: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
- RE: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
- Re: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
- Re: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
Wednesday, 6 August 2008
- ISO version of Relax NG compact syntax
- 7.1.8 p:escape-markup : Make the note more complete
- Re: exclude-inline-prefixes or ignore-inline-prefixes?
- Re: Dynamic creation of parameters without @namespace
- Re: Dynamic creation of parameters without @namespace
- Re: Agenda updated
- Re: Dynamic creation of parameters without @namespace
- RE: Dynamic creation of parameters without @namespace
- Re: Agenda updated
- Re: 2.5 Environement
- Agenda updated
- Re: 4.8 Extensions steps
- Re: 2.5 Environement
- Re: Add RNC to p:validate-with-relax-ng
- Re: Add RNC to p:validate-with-relax-ng
- Re: 2.5 Environement
- Re: 4.8 Extensions steps
- XProc Agenda 7 Aug 2008
- Re: Add RNC to p:validate-with-relax-ng
- New draft published: 6 Aug 2008
- Re: p:episode
- Re: Add RNC to p:validate-with-relax-ng
- Re: Dynamic creation of parameters without @namespace
- Re: Typo in 5.15 (p:file/p:data)
- Please register for the Technical Plenary
- Re: XProc face-to-face meeting at the W3C Technical Plenary in Mandelieu
Monday, 4 August 2008
- RE: Dynamic creation of parameters without @namespace
- RE: Dynamic creation of parameters without @namespace