Re: Allow p:pipeline in p:library

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:

> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | I don't think it was an oversight
> |
> | I think it was something deliberate : if you want to put something in
> | library, you got to remove the magic
>
> Why? There's no magic in p:pipeline anymore, it's just syntactic
> sugar. I've got a couple of working pipelines, I want to put them in a
> library, now suddenly I have to rewrite the declarations? Why?


Exactly as you have to rewrap the code within your "void main()" method to
be able to reuse it


Mohamed



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €