- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:32:53 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 14:33:32 UTC
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | I think making it an error would allow us to allow it later...but I would be | pleased to allow it right now when XPath 2.0 is selected There is a streaming/performance impact: an implementation will have to provide the whole sequence to each variable/option. | On slight thing, how do make the difference between an empty document and an | empty sequence ? You mean for the XPath 1.0 case? I think if we allow sequences we should make XPath 1.0 implementations simply take the first document on the sequence. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If you're strong enough, there *are* no http://nwalsh.com/ | precedents.--Scott Fitzgerald
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 14:33:32 UTC