- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:03:21 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m24ph8iewm.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: |> And I think the answer then is yes. If the for-each doesn't have a |> select expression, then the whole document, PIs, comments, and all |> goes through. | | Thanks Norm, that's where I was going, so in this case, your proposal seems | to propose different behavior for (NO @select) and for (@select="/") | Is this intended ? No. Sorry. I think <p:for-each> ... and <p:for-each select="/"> ... are indistinguishable. The former selects all the documents that appear on the input source; the second selects...all the documents that appear on the input source. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Is your cucumber bitter? Throw it away. http://nwalsh.com/ | Are there briars in your path? Turn | aside. That is enough. Do not go on to | say, 'Why were things of this sort ever | brought into the world?'--Marcus | Aurelius
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 12:03:34 UTC