- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:32:51 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2zlz1lefw.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | On 10/2/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: |> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: |> | In 5.1.1 |> | |> | Please precise which nodes are allowed to be wrapped and how ? |> | [[ |> | it is a dynamic error (err:XD0016) if the select expression on a |> | p:input returns anything other than a possibly empty set of nodes. |> | ]] |> |> I took an action at the 27 Sep 2007 telcon to clarify this. Our discussion |> on the telcon suggested that it was appropriate to select, comment, |> processing instruction, or element nodes. But, in fact, *each* selected |> node is turned into a document. So it's pointless to select anything other |> than element nodes. I propose: |> |> It is a dynamic error (err:XD0016) if the select expression on a |> p:input returns anything other than a possibly empty set of element |> nodes. |> |> (I added the word element.) |> | | And what about select="/" ? Yeah, ok. It's a bit silly since it's the same as leaving off the select, but I guess it's also a bit pedantic to make it an error. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | What are the thoughts of the canvas on http://nwalsh.com/ | which a masterpiece is being created? | "I am being soiled, brutally treated | and concealed from view." Thus men | grumble at their destiny, however | fair.--Jean Cocteau
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 15:33:09 UTC