- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:27:59 +0100
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Nov 26, 2007 4:23 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > |> | === p:uuid === > |> > |> I don't understand what you're asking. > | > | Well my point was : why isn't just UUID a possible value of the > | "scheme" option in p:label-elements ? > > That would be a new feature, are you suggesting that we should add it? > UUIDs make for awfully long IDs and the p:uuid step is optional so > I'd be reluctant to make UUID a required scheme for p:label-elements. > I'm also reluctant to have some required and some optional schemes. I understand your point, but since we now have only one XSLT step, I don't understand to have to create a new step (even optional) instead of simply adding an optional scheme and avoid multiplication of steps Mohamed > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything has been said before, but > http://nwalsh.com/ | since nobody every listens we have to > | keep going back and beginning all over > | again.--André Gide > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 26 November 2007 21:28:41 UTC