- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:43:40 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2tzniaxer.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | == Aknowledgment == | I remember a telcon where Murray was asking for an aknowledgment section | Is it planned to do it or not ? It was fashionable for a while, but seems uncommon these days. I thought we decided not to, but I don't feel strongly about it. | == Typos == | s/alrogithms/algorithms/ | s/implemenation/implementation/ | s/inejcts/injects/ | s/otpions/options/ | s/resuing/reusing/ | s/separater/separator/ | s/specifiy/specify/ | s/turend/turned/ | s/an xPath 1.0/an XPath 1.0/ Thanks. | == Ghosts == | XSLT2 is still remaining in examples | XPath 1.0 is referenced almost everywhere (for p:when, p:xpath-context, etc...) I think I've improved that in the (not yet published) 19 Nov draft. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If you settle for what they're giving http://nwalsh.com/ | you, you deserve what you get.
Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 18:43:51 UTC