Re: XProc Minutes for Technical Plenary f2f, 8/9 Nov 2007 from Henry S. Thompson on 2007-11-15 (public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org from November 2007)

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:23:29 +0000
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bzlxfy1la.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> [Delete this:]
>   If a compound step has no declared outputs and the last step in
>   its subpipeline has an unbound primary output, then an implicit
>   primary output port (named â€œresultâ€) will be added to the
>   compound step (and consequently the last step's primary output
>   will be bound to it).

I'm not at all happy losing output defaulting for _all_ compound
steps!  That's not what we agreed at the f2f, IIRC.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHPGRxkjnJixAXWBoRAsJqAJ9e9DvAT18hQ3LARa7EATedVHez/QCdFb+c
XmfvaQJt5QbL9VEXwZ6fSoo=
=qkh8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 15 November 2007 15:23:39 UTC