- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:34:46 +0000
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote: > / Rui Lopes <rlopes@di.fc.ul.pt> was heard to say: > | Hi all, > | > | Ok for me, but I'd prefer having an @xpath-version for p:pipeline and > | p:pipeline-library. > > That means we have to define what it means for all the possible > combinations of mixed versions on pipelines and libraries imported > into each other. > > If we can avoid that... I don't think it's that tricky. You make the flag a lexical one (as is done with XSLT 2.0), based on the nearest xpath-version attribute. Note that XPath 2.0 processors can still be used in a xpath-version="1.0" context, just they have to use backwards-compatible mode for those particular XPaths. Cheers, Jeni -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Saturday, 10 November 2007 16:34:58 UTC