- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 11:36:58 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On Nov 9, 2007 7:52 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Suppose instead we say that an implementation may use XPath 1.0 or > XPath 2.0 at its option. For the vast majority of XPath expressions > that are actually used in XProc, it won't make any difference. Yes! I remember arguing as strongly as I could that we should at the minimum allow implementors to use XPath 2.0. So you've got my vote on this one. Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms, open-source, for the Enterprise http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Friday, 9 November 2007 19:37:50 UTC