Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? from Richard Tobin on 2007-11-08 (public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org from November 2007)

From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:33:45 +0000 (GMT)
To: "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com>, "Richard Tobin" <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20071108103345.464E1284913@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk>

> And you are proposing that in that particular case, we relax the need
> to connect foo!result.
> 
> Well wasn't it the first purpose of p:sink ?

But where would you put the p:sink?  In each branch that didn't use
the port?  I think it makes more sense to just require that the port
be referenced somewhere, even if that "somewhere" turns out not to be
executed.

-- Richard

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 10:34:21 UTC