Thursday, 28 June 2007
- XProc Minutes 28 June 2007
- Re: Editor's draft for review by 28 June 2007
- Re: defaulting
- Re: Editor's draft for review by 28 June 2007
- Re: defaulting
- Re: defaulting
- Re: defaulting
- Re: defaulting
Wednesday, 27 June 2007
Tuesday, 26 June 2007
Monday, 25 June 2007
- Re: General remarks on Annex A (very big mail, sorry for that)
- Re: p:wrap-sequence
- Re: Editor's draft for review by 28 June 2007
- Re: Recursion
- Re: Recursion
- Re: Recursion
- Recursion
- Editor's draft for review by 28 June 2007
- Re: defaulting
- Re: defaulting
- Re: defaulting
- Re: defaulting
- Re: Default bindings on p:output incoherent???
- Re: General remarks on Annex A (very big mail, sorry for that)
- p:wrap-sequence
- Re: New draft...sortof
- Re: New draft...sortof
- Re: defaulting
- Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input
- Re: defaulting
- Re: New draft...sortof
- Re: New draft...sortof
Sunday, 24 June 2007
Saturday, 23 June 2007
- Re: New draft...sortof
- Re: Default bindings on p:output incoherent???
- General remarks on Annex A (very big mail, sorry for that)
Friday, 22 June 2007
- Re: defaulting
- Re: defaulting
- Re: defaulting
- Re: defaulting
- defaulting
- XProc Minutes 21 June 2007
- Re: Default bindings on p:output incoherent???
- Re: Cardinality of inputs
- Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input
- Default bindings on p:output incoherent???
Thursday, 21 June 2007
- Re: Cardinality of inputs
- Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input
- Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input
- Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input
- Re: Cardinality of inputs
- Re: New draft...sortof
- Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input
- Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input
- Re: Allow ignored namespaces everywhere?
- Re: Allow ignored namespaces everywhere?
- Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input
- Re: Allow ignored namespaces everywhere?
- Re: XProc Agenda 21 June 2007
- Re: Cardinality of inputs
- Re: New draft...sortof
- Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input
Wednesday, 20 June 2007
- XProc Agenda 21 June 2007
- Re: Consensus?
- Re: p:equal
- Re: Allow ignored namespaces everywhere?
- New draft...sortof
- p:input vs. p:parameter-input
- Some edge cases with respect to parameters
- Allow ignored namespaces everywhere?
- Consensus?
- p:equal
- XProc Minutes 14 June 2007
Thursday, 14 June 2007
Wednesday, 13 June 2007
- Re: On parameters
- XProc Agenda 14 June 2007
- Re: Two renames
- Re: Two renames
- Re: Two renames
- Re: Two renames
Tuesday, 12 June 2007
Monday, 11 June 2007
Sunday, 10 June 2007
Friday, 8 June 2007
- Two renames
- Re: Composability
- Re: Composability
- Re: Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT
- New draft, 8 June 2007
- Re: Composability
- Re: Composability
- Re: Pipeline Parameters by Default
- Re: Composability
- Re: Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT
- Re: Do we have consensus on these three proposals?
- Re: Pipeline Parameters by Default
- Re: Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT (was Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit)
Thursday, 7 June 2007
- Re: Composability
- Re: Composability
- Re: position() after match in component
- Re: Proposal for p:split-sequence
- Re: Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT
- We need a versioning story
- Pipeline Parameters by Default
- Cardinality of inputs
- Re: Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT
- Re: Proposal for p:split-sequence
- XProc Minutes 7 June 2007
- Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT (was Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit)
- Re: position() after match in component
- Re: position() after match in component
- Re: position() after match in component
- Re: position() after match in component
- Do we have consensus on these three proposals?
- Re: position() after match in component
- position() after match in component
- Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit
- Re: Revised parameters proposal
- Re: Tricky samples of position()
- Re: select in for-each and iteration-source
- Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit
- Re: Composability
- Re: Revised parameters proposal
- Re: Revised parameters proposal
- Re: Tricky samples of position()
- Re: Composability
- Re: Composability
- Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit
- Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit
Wednesday, 6 June 2007
- Re: select in for-each and iteration-source
- Re: Revised parameters proposal
- Tricky samples of position()
- Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit
- Re: select in for-each and iteration-source
- Re: Composability
- Re: Revised parameters proposal
- Re: Revised parameters proposal
- Re: Revised parameters proposal
- The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit
- Re: @select on p:for-each redundant?
- Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling
- Re: select in for-each and iteration-source
- Re: Revised parameters proposal
- Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling
- Revised parameters proposal
- Re: @select on p:for-each redundant?
- Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling
- Re: Composability
- @select on p:for-each redundant?
- Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling
- Re: XProc Agenda 7 June 2007
- Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling
- Re: position vs index
- Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling
- Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling
- Re: Context for p:option
- Re: Composability
- Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling
- XProc Agenda 7 June 2007
- Re: Context for p:option
- Re: Context for p:option
- Re: position vs index
- Re: Context for p:option
- Re: Context for p:option
- Re: Low hanging fruit?
- Re: Context for p:option
- Re: can we have last() having a consistent value ?
- Re: Low hanging fruit?
- Re: Another ('nother) parameters proposal
- Re: Replace p:episode with p:system-property
- Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes
- Re: position vs index
- Re: Allow @namespace on p:pipeline
- Re: Option syntax
- Re: Allow @namespace on p:pipeline
- Re: High priority items for Thursday
- Re: For-each
- Re: Context for p:option
- Re: can we have last() having a consistent value ?
- Re: Allow unknown steps?
Tuesday, 5 June 2007
- Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes
- Re: Cardinality of inputs
- Re: !result in components
- Re: For-each
- For-each
Monday, 4 June 2007
- Re: !result in components
- Re: Allow @namespace on p:pipeline
- Allow @namespace on p:pipeline
- High priority items for Thursday
- Updated editor's draft
Saturday, 2 June 2007
Friday, 1 June 2007
- Re: Option syntax
- Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes
- Re: Cardinality of inputs
- Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes
- Re: Cardinality of inputs
- Cardinality of inputs
- Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes
- Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes
- Re: Composability
- Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes