- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:22:37 +0200
- To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Dear, When I was re reading the answer of Norm to my demand for a p:equal-sequence (which was do-it-with-for-each !), I suddently see that we cannot do that efficiently in for-each And moreover that's a task that is useful I propose to add a p:pack (not so sure about the name) <p:declare-step type="p:pack"> <p:input port="*" sequence="yes"/> <p:output port="result" sequence="yes"/> <p:option name="wrapper" required="yes"/> </p:declare-step> What it does is simple It takes p sequence (seq_1,....seq_p) of respective length (len_1, ....len_p) It outputs a sequence of length max(len_1, ...len_p) and for each position of doc of the result sequence we have result_1 (wrap(seq_1(i), .....seq_p(i)) Where seq_k(i) is non empty if k <= len_k I was thinking to give a special component that can distribute multiple flows at the same time, but the fact is that we that component and for-each, you can do it as efficiently I ask it for beeing a required step (since it's not difficult to implement) Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Sunday, 29 July 2007 17:22:40 UTC