Compound step terminology (editorial)

• From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
• Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:36:22 +0100 (BST)
• To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20070725143622.C8DA023605F@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Just an editorial point:

I find the description of compound steps in 2.1 rather unclear.  What
are the contained steps of a p:choose?  Are p:when and p:otherwise
steps, or just syntax?  If the former, then 2.1 implies that they form
a subpipeline, when in fact each of them is a subpipeline.  If the
latter, then p:choose doesn't have any contained steps, because the
steps don't "occur directly" within p:choose.

-- Richard

Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 14:36:24 UTC